What this is
A record. Not a campaign. Not a verdict. Each entry surfaces what is publicly documented about a named individual or institution — a court ruling, an audit finding, a credible report. The interface treats sources as first-class; you can verify every claim by following the citations beneath it.
No individual is described as a wrongdoer unless a court has so determined. The default legal-status tag is alleged, and the tone of every entry matches the heaviest status the entry carries.
What this is not
Not a partisan project. Both ruling and opposition figures appear in the archive on the same terms.
Not a petition. The call to action is read and verify, not sign and share.
Not a news site. The archive does not chase headlines; it deposits records.
How to use it
Read the 1000 reasons sequentially or browse the Heroes archive by name, status, or year. Click any entry to read the full record with sources and legal-status context. If a claim matters, follow the citations to the original source and judge for yourself.
Right of reply
If you are named in an entry and the record is wrong, write to corrections@1000reasons.vote or use the corrections form. We acknowledge within 48 hours and publish corrections in full, with the original entry preserved in the audit log.
Methodology
Read how we built the archive for data sources, verification process, inclusion criteria, and limitations.